The Georgian towers of London

The Tower of London bores me.

Hell, it’s not even much of a tower. Just a low stone enclosure built by the Norman King William The Conqueror to protect himself from his unruly English subjects.

Some snob at the NYT doesn’t approve. What a surprise.

No, I like those other towers of London.

Those glass and steel structures of increasingly goofy shapes and sizes that keep popping up all over the central London landscape.

London’s Georgian towers.

No, I’m not talking about towers inspired by the architecture of the King George era.

I’m talking about George Jetson fashion towers.

The Lloyds of London building looks like it’s getting ready to launch itself into space at any moment.

Listen, I keep scanning the sky hoping to spot George, his boy Elroy, daughter Judy and Peg his wife zipping home. (Plus, the dog whose name I forgot.)

Every time I go back to the city there seem to be more Georgian towers. And some are so bizarre that I have this theory.

That London architects have a great sense of humor. And that they are in a competition to see who can design the best George Jetson retro-futuristic apartment-skyport complex.

Because we all know that air taxis are just around the corner.

Ruined! Au contraire.
Look what they’ve done to my glass egg, Ma.

One of my favorite London Georgian structure wasn’t a skyscraper. But I always liked the glass-domed London City Hall.

But on this trip I discovered it’s been gutted and is now being redesigned.

And anti-Georgian backlash?

Nah, the city couldn’t afford it anymore. So it moved to a cheaper building. And the owner is now creating terraced apartments where bureaucrats used to sit under glass and, um, reflect.

The cone-shaped “gherkin” building to the right of the HMS Belfast used to dominate the London skyline. Now it’s the runt of the litter.

How fast is London’s glass skyline changing? Not too long ago the vibrator-shaped “gherkin” building dominated the skyline. Now it’s all but overshadowed by newer, taller, more ambitious structures.

Everybody’s a critic. Why don’t they leave that stuff to Trained Observers Of The Human Condition like your’s truly?

Not surprisingly, everybody is not on board with London’s Future World skyline.

There are lots of stuffy critics who think London is going to Disney Tomorrow Land Hell in a hand basket.

Chaos is good.

For instance, a New York Times critic called it a “chaotic cacophony.”

But it’s well known that nobody at The New York Times has a sense of humor.

Weird is good. Weird turns heads.

And anyway, I gotta ask: What’s so bad about chaotic cacophony? Hell, what’s Donald Trump all about if not American chaotic cacophony?

Who are we to point fingers?

How can anybody tell? Londoner’s are notorious for walking around in the rain, their upper lips stiff.

All I know is that London’s ‘Incoherent’ skyline is a photographer’s dreamscape come true.

Plus, London’s Georgian Towers are a full employment dream come true for window washers who don’t get nose bleeds. (Although they’re the kiss of death for chimney sweeps.)

Hell, I just hope the forces of common sense won’t ruin it for those of us who still hope to catch a glimpse of George, Elroy, Judy, Peg and that dog headed home.

Leave a comment